
Updated 3 Nov 2026
Is the New Balance 2002R worth it?
Yes β the comfiest retro runner, for a price.
It's built on a real running shoe, so it's stable, cushioned and supports the arch, and it stays comfortable for a whole day out. The suede and mesh are well made. It's one of the dearer sneakers here, it's narrower at the toes than the 574, and it isn't light.
Good to know
- Narrow at the toes, at 67 mm near the big toe.
- Heavier than it looks, at about 380 g each.
- Runs true to size; the overlays stretch a little with wear.

- Stable, with real arch support
- Comfortable all day
- Premium suede and mesh
We earn a commission from these links.
Get it ifβ¦
- You want a retro runner you can walk in all day.
- You like support under the arch.
- You want premium materials.
Skip it ifβ¦
- You have wide feet β try the 574.
- You'd rather spend less.
More on the NB 2002R
How we reached this verdict
RunRepeat's lab rated it 93/100: stable, supportive and well cushioned, but narrow (67.2 mm at the big toe) and pricey. Captain Creps found it true to size and comfortable, with overlays that give a little over time. We haven't found verified owner reviews we can count yet.
We compared independent expert reviews with the manufacturer's specifications, then checked it's sold at a major retailer where you live. We don't test products ourselves.
Sources: RunRepeat: New Balance 2002R, Captain Creps: New Balance 2002R sizing, New Balance (specs), RunRepeat: ASICS Gel-1130, RunRepeat: adidas Samba OG, RunRepeat: adidas Gazelle, RunRepeat: New Balance 530, RunRepeat: New Balance 9060, RunRepeat: Nike Air Force 1 '07, RunRepeat: Reebok Club C 85, RunRepeat: Nike Dunk Low, RunRepeat: New Balance 550, RunRepeat: New Balance 574, RunRepeat: Nike Air Max SC, RunRepeat: Vans Old Skool, RunRepeat: ASICS Gel-NYC, Captain Creps: sizing guides, manufacturer specifications.
Updated 3 Nov 2026How we decide