TCL QM6K vs Hisense U6SF Pro
Get the Hisense U6SF Pro. Unless you play a lot of fast games: the TCL QM6K's motion is much clearer.
TCL QM6K
A cheap Mini LED with deep blacks, accurate colour and 144Hz gaming. Not bright enough for punchy HDR.
Hisense U6SF Pro
A bright, high-contrast big screen for the least money. Motion is blurry.
We earn a commission from these links.
RTINGS scores the U6SF Pro higher: it's bright enough to beat glare, has excellent contrast, great accuracy and great reflection handling. But its motion is extremely blurry, while the QM6K's pixel response is fast for an LED TV.
- —Your room is bright.
- —You mostly watch TV, films and sport.
- —Lamps or windows face the TV.
Key differences
Pros and cons
- +Deep blacks for a cheap TV
- +Accurate colour out of the box
- +4K 144Hz with extremely low lag
- −HDR is too dim for real impact.
- −Noticeable haloing around bright objects on dark backgrounds.
- −Reflections from lamps and windows facing it show.
- −Low-resolution video looks a little soft.
- +Bright enough for daytime viewing
- +Excellent contrast for the price
- +Makes low-quality streams look cleaner
- −Uneven brightness patches on plain backgrounds.
- −Image fades quickly from the sides.
Ready to choose?
- Is the TCL QM6K worth it?
- Is the Hisense U6 Pro worth it?
- LG C6 vs LG B6
- Hisense U7 vs LG C6
- Hisense U7 vs Hisense U6 Pro
- LG B6 vs Hisense U7
- Best TVs
How we reached this verdict
We compared independent expert reviews with the manufacturer's specifications, then checked it's sold at a major retailer where you live. We don't test products ourselves.
Sources: RTINGS, TechRadar, Tom's Guide, Expert Reviews, Trusted Reviews, manufacturer specifications.